A regulatory fine for reporting failures reads like a technical matter between a firm and its supervisor. The consumer interest is in what the failure delayed: if a firm cannot see its own data accurately, the patterns that reveal scam payments and mule accounts arrive late.
What the case was about
The penalty concerned the accuracy and timeliness of regulatory returns over an extended period, not customer losses directly. The firm has since remediated its reporting and the fine was discounted for early settlement — a standard mechanism, not a comment on severity.
Why reporting quality matters to victims
- Receiving-bank data is how mule accounts are identified and closed.
- Reimbursement costs are shared between sending and receiving firms, so accurate data decides who pays.
- Supervisors set expectations from aggregate returns; bad data distorts the picture of where fraud is concentrated.
What it does not do
A fine is not compensation. Money from penalties does not reach consumers, and no listing or enforcement notice creates an automatic entitlement to a refund. Individual redress runs through the firm's complaints process and then, if needed, the Financial Ombudsman Service.
The free routes are unchanged
Bank first, then Action Fraud for the crime report, then the Financial Ombudsman Service if the bank's decision is wrong, and the FCA consumer helpline on 0800 111 6768 for authorisation questions. We report enforcement outcomes as facts on the public record and do not draw conclusions about any individual's case.
Named in this report
Each file gathers every warning, published contact detail and update we hold on that name.
Firm warnings published each month
98 in this window · down 17 on the month before
- 2Apr
- 1May
- 2Jun
- 4Jul
- 53Aug
- 36Sept
Counted from the warning notices in our own archive. One notice can name several trading styles.
The wider record
Counts from our own archive, for context around this report. Not an estimate of fraud across the UK.
Clone firms as a share of our Warning List archive
Clone firms copy the name or details of a genuine authorised business.
- Clone of an authorised firm17(16%)
- Not recorded as a clone89(84%)
Contact details recorded against warned firms
One firm can appear in more than one row.
Website recorded76(35%)
Website recorded: 76 entriesPhone recorded39(18%)
Phone recorded: 39 entriesEmail recorded85(39%)
Email recorded: 85 entriesNo contact details held16(7%)
No contact details held: 16 entries
Open the data page to see how each figure is counted.
How this report was made
- Updated
- 3 times
- Primary sources
- 6 sources
- Following this subject
- 0 readers
- Reader comments
- 0 comments
Checked against the published record
FCA
FCA and PRA enforcement noticesThe enforcement notice this report summarises.
FCA
Financial Conduct Authority Warning ListPrimary record of firms the FCA says may be operating without authorisation.
FCA
FCA Financial Services RegisterAuthoritative check on whether a firm is authorised and for what.
PSR
Payment Systems Regulator — APP fraud reimbursementThe reimbursement requirement for authorised push payment fraud.
FOS
Financial Ombudsman ServiceFree, independent adjudication and published decision data.
Action Fraud
Action Fraud reporting serviceThe UK national reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime.
Sourcing. Every claim is tied to a published record — a regulator's notice, a court or ombudsman decision, or a document we hold. We quote a headline and a short summary and link the original.
Right of reply. Firms and people we criticise are put on notice before publication and their response is carried in the piece.
Independence. No affiliate links, no sponsored placements and no referrals to solicitors or claims firms. The only routes we point to are free. Read the full method · first published 21/08/2026
Trust and sourcing
- Bylined
- Editor approved
- Not flagged for review
Legal review
Not required
No individual or firm is criticised, so no right of reply was required.
Source URLs behind this report
- FCA
https://www.fca.org.uk/news/search-results?np_category=news&start=0
The enforcement notice this report summarises.
- FCA
https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/warning-list-unauthorised-firms
Primary record of firms the FCA says may be operating without authorisation.
- FCA
https://register.fca.org.uk/
Authoritative check on whether a firm is authorised and for what.
- PSR
https://www.psr.org.uk/
The reimbursement requirement for authorised push payment fraud.
- FOS
https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/
Free, independent adjudication and published decision data.
- Action Fraud
https://www.actionfraud.police.uk/
The UK national reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime.
What changed in each update
First published 21 August 2026 at 10:00 · last updated 24 August 2026 at 12:00
Added the current free reporting routes and clarified what the reimbursement rules do and do not cover.
Payment Systems RegulatorChecked against the source record and refreshed the figures and dates in the panels. No findings changed.
FCA Financial Services RegisterFirst published.
FCA Warning List
Updates and change log
- First published
- Last updated
Added the current free reporting routes and clarified what the reimbursement rules do and do not cover.
Payment Systems RegulatorChecked against the source record and refreshed the figures and dates in the panels. No findings changed.
FCA Financial Services RegisterFirst published.
FCA Warning List
Sources for this report
- FCA FCA and PRA enforcement notices — The enforcement notice this report summarises.
- FCA Financial Conduct Authority Warning List — Primary record of firms the FCA says may be operating without authorisation.
- FCA FCA Financial Services Register — Authoritative check on whether a firm is authorised and for what.
- PSR Payment Systems Regulator — APP fraud reimbursement — The reimbursement requirement for authorised push payment fraud.
- FOS Financial Ombudsman Service — Free, independent adjudication and published decision data.
- Action Fraud Action Fraud reporting service — The UK national reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime.
Sources for this report
FCA and PRA enforcement notices
FCA
The enforcement notice this report summarises.
Read the original sourceFinancial Conduct Authority Warning List
FCA
Primary record of firms the FCA says may be operating without authorisation.
Read the original sourceFCA Financial Services Register
FCA
Authoritative check on whether a firm is authorised and for what.
Read the original sourcePayment Systems Regulator — APP fraud reimbursement
PSR
The reimbursement requirement for authorised push payment fraud.
Read the original sourceFinancial Ombudsman Service
FOS
Free, independent adjudication and published decision data.
Read the original sourceAction Fraud reporting service
Action Fraud
The UK national reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime.
Read the original source
We link directly to the original source wherever possible. A source may update its own page after we publish; we show the date we last recorded or updated the citation.
Share a quote card
Generate a branded image of the key line from this report, with the link on it, to post or send on.
Related reporting
Twenty firms added to the FCA Warning List in the week to 24 August, six of them clones
Our archive recorded twenty new or updated entries on the Financial Conduct Authority's Warning List over the past week. Six copied the identity of an authorised firm.
Mon 24 Aug
NCSC and partners expose "zero-click" phishing campaign aimed at Western organisations
The National Cyber Security Centre and international partners have attributed a phishing campaign requiring no user interaction to Russian state-supported actors. Consumer accounts are not the stated target.
Sun 23 Aug
Bank Rate held at 3.75 per cent, and what that means for "fixed return" adverts
With Bank Rate unchanged at 3.75 per cent, advertised returns far above the best available savings rates remain the clearest marker of an unauthorised promotion.
Tue 18 Aug
Late-summer holiday fraud follows the travel advice cycle
Fraudulent accommodation and flight listings track periods when official travel advice changes and travellers rebook at short notice. Payment method is the deciding factor in recovery.
Sun 16 Aug
About the author
Helen Marsden — Helen has reported on retail financial services and consumer credit in the UK for fifteen years. She signs off every story on this site and is responsible for corrections.
Reader comments
0 published comments · moderated by the newsroom
House rules: comments are for readers' own experience and questions about the reporting. We remove spam, abuse and anything that names a private individual without cause. Comments containing links are held for an editor before they appear. We cannot tell you whether you have a claim, and we do not pass details to any solicitor, claims firm or representative.