Skip to main content

Independent UK reporting on scams, fraud and financial harm

Explainer

Reporting fraud: who to tell, in what order, and why the order matters

Your bank comes first because only it can attempt to freeze the receiving account. Action Fraud records the crime for policing purposes.

By Helen Marsden, Editor · Updated

Hands filling in an online fraud report form on a laptop at night
Illustrative picture. It does not depict any firm or individual named in this report.

Explainer

Redress and rights

Published
14 Aug 2026
Last revised
17 Aug 2026
Sources cited
5
Names named
None
Share thisWhatsAppXLinkedInFacebook Email

Reporting fraud is two separate jobs with two separate audiences: your bank, which decides whether you are reimbursed, and the police reporting service, which records the crime. Doing one does not do the other, and the order matters.

Your bank comes first

Call the number on your card. Say plainly that you have been the victim of a scam, give the exact payment details, and ask for three things: an attempt to recall the payment, the case to be logged as a scam claim, and the decision in writing. Ask for the case reference before you hang up. Then change any passwords the fraudster may have obtained and check for new payees, new devices and forwarding rules on your email.

Then the police reporting route

In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, report to Action Fraud at actionfraud.police.uk or on 0300 123 2040. In Scotland, report to Police Scotland on 101. You will get a reference; keep it with your file. Reports are assessed for links to other cases, which is why detail — account numbers, phone numbers, domains, times — is worth more than narrative.

Build the file once

  1. A timeline: every contact, call and payment with dates and times.
  2. Screenshots of adverts, messages, dashboards and websites before they disappear.
  3. Bank statements marking each disputed payment.
  4. The names, numbers, emails and account details the fraudster used.
  5. Every letter from the bank, including the final response.

Where else to report

Texts forward to 7726 free of charge. Suspicious emails go to the national suspicious email reporting service. If a firm claimed to be authorised, the FCA consumer helpline on 0800 111 6768 can confirm and can log the impersonation. If your bank's decision is wrong, the Financial Ombudsman Service is free.

We publish process, not advice, and we do not put readers in touch with paid representatives.

Firm warnings published each month

98 in this window · down 17 on the month before

  • 2Apr
  • 1May
  • 2Jun
  • 4Jul
  • 53Aug
  • 36Sept

Counted from the warning notices in our own archive. One notice can name several trading styles.

The wider record

Counts from our own archive, for context around this report. Not an estimate of fraud across the UK.

Clone firms as a share of our Warning List archive

Clone firms copy the name or details of a genuine authorised business.

106
  • Clone of an authorised firm17(16%)
  • Not recorded as a clone89(84%)

Contact details recorded against warned firms

One firm can appear in more than one row.

  • Website recorded76(35%)

    Website recorded: 76 entries
  • Phone recorded39(18%)

    Phone recorded: 39 entries
  • Email recorded85(39%)

    Email recorded: 85 entries
  • No contact details held16(7%)

    No contact details held: 16 entries

Open the data page to see how each figure is counted.

See all of our fraud data

How this report was made

Updated
3 times
Primary sources
5 sources
Following this subject
0 readers
Reader comments
0 comments

Checked against the published record

Sourcing. Every claim is tied to a published record — a regulator's notice, a court or ombudsman decision, or a document we hold. We quote a headline and a short summary and link the original.

Right of reply. Firms and people we criticise are put on notice before publication and their response is carried in the piece.

Independence. No affiliate links, no sponsored placements and no referrals to solicitors or claims firms. The only routes we point to are free. Read the full method · first published 14/08/2026

Trust and sourcing

  • Reported by

    Helen Marsden

    Editor

    Bylined
  • Approved for publication by

    Helen Marsden

    Editor

    Editor approved
  • Legal review

    Not required

    No individual or firm is criticised, so no right of reply was required.

    Not flagged for review

Source URLs behind this report

What changed in each update

First published 14 August 2026 at 08:00 · last updated 17 August 2026 at 10:00

  1. Added the current free reporting routes and clarified what the reimbursement rules do and do not cover.

    Payment Systems Regulator
  2. Checked against the source record and refreshed the figures and dates in the panels. No findings changed.

    FCA Financial Services Register
  3. First published.

    FCA Warning List
How we source and correct our reporting

Updates and change log

First published
Last updated
  1. Added the current free reporting routes and clarified what the reimbursement rules do and do not cover.

    Payment Systems Regulator
  2. Checked against the source record and refreshed the figures and dates in the panels. No findings changed.

    FCA Financial Services Register
  3. First published.

    FCA Warning List

Sources for this report

Sources for this report

  • FCA logo

    Financial Conduct Authority Warning List

    FCA

    Primary record of firms the FCA says may be operating without authorisation.

    Read the original source
  • FCA logo

    FCA Financial Services Register

    FCA

    Authoritative check on whether a firm is authorised and for what.

    Read the original source
  • PSR logo

    Payment Systems Regulator — APP fraud reimbursement

    PSR

    The reimbursement requirement for authorised push payment fraud.

    Read the original source
  • FOS logo

    Financial Ombudsman Service

    FOS

    Free, independent adjudication and published decision data.

    Read the original source
  • Action Fraud logo

    Action Fraud reporting service

    Action Fraud

    The UK national reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime.

    Read the original source

We link directly to the original source wherever possible. A source may update its own page after we publish; we show the date we last recorded or updated the citation.

Readers can upvote helpful reporting.
Share thisWhatsAppXLinkedInFacebook Email

Share a quote card

Generate a branded image of the key line from this report, with the link on it, to post or send on.

  • Redress and rights

Reader comments

0 published comments · moderated by the newsroom

House rules: comments are for readers' own experience and questions about the reporting. We remove spam, abuse and anything that names a private individual without cause. Comments containing links are held for an editor before they appear. We cannot tell you whether you have a claim, and we do not pass details to any solicitor, claims firm or representative.

  1. Loading comments…

About the author

Byline portrait of Helen Marsden

Helen Marsden Helen has reported on retail financial services and consumer credit in the UK for fifteen years. She signs off every story on this site and is responsible for corrections.