Skip to main content

Independent UK reporting on scams, fraud and financial harm

Investigation

Inside a clone firm: three weeks on the receiving end of a boiler room

A reporter answered one cold call and kept answering. What followed was a scripted, twenty-day operation using the reference number of a genuinely authorised London firm — and a bank transfer request that arrived, politely, on day nine.

By Priya Raghavan, Reporter, investment and firms

Two near-identical letterheads side by side under a magnifying glass
Illustrative picture. It does not depict any firm or individual named in this report.

Investigation

Scam types

Published
25 Aug 2026
Last revised
No revisions
Sources cited
3
Names named
None
Share thisWhatsAppXLinkedInFacebook Email

The first call came at 11:04 on a Tuesday. The man introduced himself as a portfolio associate at a firm whose name sits on the Financial Conduct Authority Register, gave a reference number that checks out, and asked whether we had "reviewed the bond literature". We had not. He offered to send it.

Over the next twenty days we recorded every call, kept every document, and checked every claim against the public record. This is what a clone operation looks like from the inside — not the caricature of a shouting salesman, but a slow, courteous, well-rehearsed machine.

Day one to three: the borrowed identity

The reference number was real. The firm it belongs to is authorised, based in London, and had nothing to do with the calls. That is the whole trick of a clone: the caller does not invent credibility, he borrows it. The literature arrived as a well-typeset PDF quoting a fixed 7.4 per cent return, "capital protected", on a two-year bond.

  • The email domain was registered eleven weeks earlier.
  • The telephone number was a mobile, not the switchboard on the Register.
  • The address in the footer matched the authorised firm. The bank details, later, did not.

Day four to eight: the qualification script

The questions were relentlessly friendly and entirely one-directional: how long had we been investing, who currently held the money, had we told anyone about the call. That last question was asked three separate times in different words. Isolation is not a by-product of this script. It is a stage of it.

Day nine: the ask

The transfer request arrived by email, then by phone within ninety seconds — "just so you know the account name looks slightly different, that is our custodian". No money was ever sent. The account name was a company incorporated four months earlier with a single director and no filings.

Day ten to twenty: the pressure and the exit

When we said the money was delayed, the tone changed twice: first to urgency, then, on day sixteen, to a "compliance" caller offering to escalate a complaint about his own colleague. This second-line act is well documented in warning notices and it works for the same reason the first act works — it sounds like a real institution behaving well.

On day twenty the number stopped connecting. Three days later a new entry appeared on the Warning List with the same website and a different firm name.

How to check the same claim in two minutes

  • Look up the reference number on the FCA Register and call the switchboard number listed there — never the number you were given.
  • Search the FCA Warning List for the firm name, the website and the telephone number separately.
  • Check the receiving company at Companies House: incorporation date and filing history are public.

If you have already sent money, contact your bank immediately, then the Financial Ombudsman Service if the bank rejects your claim, then Action Fraud. The FCA consumer helpline on 0800 111 6768 answers questions about authorisation. All four are free to use.

Firm warnings published each month

98 in this window · down 17 on the month before

  • 2Apr
  • 1May
  • 2Jun
  • 4Jul
  • 53Aug
  • 36Sept

Counted from the warning notices in our own archive. One notice can name several trading styles.

The wider record

Counts from our own archive, for context around this report. Not an estimate of fraud across the UK.

Clone firms as a share of our Warning List archive

Clone firms copy the name or details of a genuine authorised business.

106
  • Clone of an authorised firm17(16%)
  • Not recorded as a clone89(84%)

Contact details recorded against warned firms

One firm can appear in more than one row.

  • Website recorded76(35%)

    Website recorded: 76 entries
  • Phone recorded39(18%)

    Phone recorded: 39 entries
  • Email recorded85(39%)

    Email recorded: 85 entries
  • No contact details held16(7%)

    No contact details held: 16 entries

Open the data page to see how each figure is counted.

See all of our fraud data

How this report was made

Updated
Not revised since publication
Primary sources
3 sources
Following this subject
0 readers
Reader comments
0 comments

Checked against the published record

Sourcing. Every claim is tied to a published record — a regulator's notice, a court or ombudsman decision, or a document we hold. We quote a headline and a short summary and link the original.

Right of reply. Firms and people we criticise are put on notice before publication and their response is carried in the piece.

Independence. No affiliate links, no sponsored placements and no referrals to solicitors or claims firms. The only routes we point to are free. Read the full method · first published 25/08/2026

Trust and sourcing

  • Reported by

    Priya Raghavan

    Reporter, investment and firms

    Bylined
  • Approved for publication by

    Helen Marsden

    Editor

    Editor approved
  • Legal review

    Not required

    No individual or firm is criticised, so no right of reply was required.

    Not flagged for review

Source URLs behind this report

  • Financial Conduct Authority

    https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/warning-list-unauthorised-firms

    Checked for the firm name, website and telephone number separately.

  • Financial Conduct Authority

    https://register.fca.org.uk/

    Used to confirm the reference number belonged to an unrelated authorised firm.

  • Companies House

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/

    Incorporation date and filing history are public.

What changed in each update

First published 25 August 2026 at 06:00 · last updated 25 August 2026 at 17:43

Nothing has changed since first publication.

How we source and correct our reporting

Updates and change log

First published
Last updated

No changes have been made since first publication.

Sources for this report

Sources for this report

  • Financial Conduct Authority logo

    FCA Warning List

    Financial Conduct Authority

    Checked for the firm name, website and telephone number separately.

    Read the original source
  • Financial Conduct Authority logo

    Financial Services Register

    Financial Conduct Authority

    Used to confirm the reference number belonged to an unrelated authorised firm.

    Read the original source
  • Companies House logo

    Company record of the receiving account name

    Companies House

    Incorporation date and filing history are public.

    Read the original source

We link directly to the original source wherever possible. A source may update its own page after we publish; we show the date we last recorded or updated the citation.

Readers can upvote helpful reporting.
Share thisWhatsAppXLinkedInFacebook Email

Share a quote card

Generate a branded image of the key line from this report, with the link on it, to post or send on.

  • Clone firms
  • Investment scams
  • Firms and warnings

Reader comments

0 published comments · moderated by the newsroom

House rules: comments are for readers' own experience and questions about the reporting. We remove spam, abuse and anything that names a private individual without cause. Comments containing links are held for an editor before they appear. We cannot tell you whether you have a claim, and we do not pass details to any solicitor, claims firm or representative.

  1. Loading comments…

About the author

Byline portrait of Priya Raghavan

Priya Raghavan Priya tracks the FCA Warning List, clone firms and unauthorised investment promotions, and writes the reference explainers.