The first call came at 11:04 on a Tuesday. The man introduced himself as a portfolio associate at a firm whose name sits on the Financial Conduct Authority Register, gave a reference number that checks out, and asked whether we had "reviewed the bond literature". We had not. He offered to send it.
Over the next twenty days we recorded every call, kept every document, and checked every claim against the public record. This is what a clone operation looks like from the inside — not the caricature of a shouting salesman, but a slow, courteous, well-rehearsed machine.
Day one to three: the borrowed identity
The reference number was real. The firm it belongs to is authorised, based in London, and had nothing to do with the calls. That is the whole trick of a clone: the caller does not invent credibility, he borrows it. The literature arrived as a well-typeset PDF quoting a fixed 7.4 per cent return, "capital protected", on a two-year bond.
- The email domain was registered eleven weeks earlier.
- The telephone number was a mobile, not the switchboard on the Register.
- The address in the footer matched the authorised firm. The bank details, later, did not.
Day four to eight: the qualification script
The questions were relentlessly friendly and entirely one-directional: how long had we been investing, who currently held the money, had we told anyone about the call. That last question was asked three separate times in different words. Isolation is not a by-product of this script. It is a stage of it.
Day nine: the ask
The transfer request arrived by email, then by phone within ninety seconds — "just so you know the account name looks slightly different, that is our custodian". No money was ever sent. The account name was a company incorporated four months earlier with a single director and no filings.
Day ten to twenty: the pressure and the exit
When we said the money was delayed, the tone changed twice: first to urgency, then, on day sixteen, to a "compliance" caller offering to escalate a complaint about his own colleague. This second-line act is well documented in warning notices and it works for the same reason the first act works — it sounds like a real institution behaving well.
On day twenty the number stopped connecting. Three days later a new entry appeared on the Warning List with the same website and a different firm name.
How to check the same claim in two minutes
- Look up the reference number on the FCA Register and call the switchboard number listed there — never the number you were given.
- Search the FCA Warning List for the firm name, the website and the telephone number separately.
- Check the receiving company at Companies House: incorporation date and filing history are public.
If you have already sent money, contact your bank immediately, then the Financial Ombudsman Service if the bank rejects your claim, then Action Fraud. The FCA consumer helpline on 0800 111 6768 answers questions about authorisation. All four are free to use.
Firm warnings published each month
98 in this window · down 17 on the month before
- 2Apr
- 1May
- 2Jun
- 4Jul
- 53Aug
- 36Sept
Counted from the warning notices in our own archive. One notice can name several trading styles.
The wider record
Counts from our own archive, for context around this report. Not an estimate of fraud across the UK.
Clone firms as a share of our Warning List archive
Clone firms copy the name or details of a genuine authorised business.
- Clone of an authorised firm17(16%)
- Not recorded as a clone89(84%)
Contact details recorded against warned firms
One firm can appear in more than one row.
Website recorded76(35%)
Website recorded: 76 entriesPhone recorded39(18%)
Phone recorded: 39 entriesEmail recorded85(39%)
Email recorded: 85 entriesNo contact details held16(7%)
No contact details held: 16 entries
Open the data page to see how each figure is counted.
How this report was made
- Updated
- Not revised since publication
- Primary sources
- 3 sources
- Following this subject
- 0 readers
- Reader comments
- 0 comments
Checked against the published record
Financial Conduct Authority
FCA Warning ListChecked for the firm name, website and telephone number separately.
Financial Conduct Authority
Financial Services RegisterUsed to confirm the reference number belonged to an unrelated authorised firm.
Companies House
Company record of the receiving account nameIncorporation date and filing history are public.
Sourcing. Every claim is tied to a published record — a regulator's notice, a court or ombudsman decision, or a document we hold. We quote a headline and a short summary and link the original.
Right of reply. Firms and people we criticise are put on notice before publication and their response is carried in the piece.
Independence. No affiliate links, no sponsored placements and no referrals to solicitors or claims firms. The only routes we point to are free. Read the full method · first published 25/08/2026
Trust and sourcing
- Bylined
- Editor approved
- Not flagged for review
Legal review
Not required
No individual or firm is criticised, so no right of reply was required.
Source URLs behind this report
- Financial Conduct Authority
https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/warning-list-unauthorised-firms
Checked for the firm name, website and telephone number separately.
- Financial Conduct Authority
https://register.fca.org.uk/
Used to confirm the reference number belonged to an unrelated authorised firm.
- Companies House
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/
Incorporation date and filing history are public.
What changed in each update
First published 25 August 2026 at 06:00 · last updated 25 August 2026 at 17:43
Nothing has changed since first publication.
How we source and correct our reportingUpdates and change log
- First published
- Last updated
No changes have been made since first publication.
Sources for this report
- Financial Conduct Authority FCA Warning List — Checked for the firm name, website and telephone number separately.
- Financial Conduct Authority Financial Services Register — Used to confirm the reference number belonged to an unrelated authorised firm.
- Companies House Company record of the receiving account name — Incorporation date and filing history are public.
Sources for this report
FCA Warning List
Financial Conduct Authority
Checked for the firm name, website and telephone number separately.
Read the original sourceFinancial Services Register
Financial Conduct Authority
Used to confirm the reference number belonged to an unrelated authorised firm.
Read the original sourceCompany record of the receiving account name
Companies House
Incorporation date and filing history are public.
Read the original source
We link directly to the original source wherever possible. A source may update its own page after we publish; we show the date we last recorded or updated the citation.
Share a quote card
Generate a branded image of the key line from this report, with the link on it, to post or send on.
- Clone firms
- Investment scams
- Firms and warnings
Related reporting
The same phone numbers keep coming back: how clone operations recycle contact details
We matched contact details across every clone entry in our Warning List archive. Numbers and email domains reappear under new firm names, which suggests a small number of operations behind many warnings.
Tue 25 Aug
Twenty firms added to the FCA Warning List in the week to 24 August, six of them clones
Our archive recorded twenty new or updated entries on the Financial Conduct Authority's Warning List over the past week. Six copied the identity of an authorised firm.
Mon 24 Aug
Thirty days of Warning List entries: what 214 records show about how fraud is sold in Britain now
We read every entry added to the FCA Warning List over the past month and coded each one. Fixed-return language dominates, domains are younger than ever, and one contact pattern appears in nearly a fifth of records.
Sat 22 Aug
Bank Rate held at 3.75 per cent, and what that means for "fixed return" adverts
With Bank Rate unchanged at 3.75 per cent, advertised returns far above the best available savings rates remain the clearest marker of an unauthorised promotion.
Tue 18 Aug
What an FCA Warning List entry does, and does not, mean
The Warning List records firms the FCA believes are operating without authorisation, or copying an authorised firm. Absence from it proves nothing.
Tue 11 Aug
Clone firms: when the details are real but the firm contacting you is not
A clone uses an authorised firm's name and reference number with its own phone number, email address or website. The authorised firm is a victim too.
Mon 10 Aug
About the author

Priya Raghavan — Priya tracks the FCA Warning List, clone firms and unauthorised investment promotions, and writes the reference explainers.

Reader comments
0 published comments · moderated by the newsroom
House rules: comments are for readers' own experience and questions about the reporting. We remove spam, abuse and anything that names a private individual without cause. Comments containing links are held for an editor before they appear. We cannot tell you whether you have a claim, and we do not pass details to any solicitor, claims firm or representative.